बीजेपी के वरिष्ठ नेता सुब्रह्मनियम स्वामी ने हरेन पांडिया की तरह अपनी जान का ख़तरा जताया, क्यों लिया मोदी-शाह का नाम?

पूर्व केंद्रीय मंत्री व् बीजेपी के वरिष्ठ नेता सुब्रह्मनियम स्वामी किसी परिचय के मोहताज नहीं हैं, वो देश विदेशों में अर्थशास्त्र पढ़ाते हैं, स्वामी अर्थशात्र के बड़े जानकार और एक्सपर्ट हैं, पिछले लम्बे समय सुब्रह्मनियम स्वामी बीजेपी में हाशिये पर हैं, एक तरह से वो पार्टी में रहते हुए भी पार्टी में नहीं हैं, स्वामी ने एक ट्वीट के जाइये अपनी जान पर खतरे की तरफ इशारा किया है, इसमें उन्होंने प्रधानमंत्री मोदी और गृहमंत्री अमित शाह का नाम भी लिया है और हरेन पांडिया की हत्या की तरफ भी इशारा किया है

Subramanian Swamy
@Swamy39

I hope Modi & Shah are not planning a Haren Pandeya on me. If so I may have to alert my friends. Remember I give as good as I get. The duo have even bluffed those in the highest authority in RSS.

File better affidavit to show Swamy’s security concerns addressed: Delhi HC to Centre

The BJP leader moved the court claiming the Centre had failed to ensure security arrangements at his private residence, after the court had directed him to vacate the government accommodation he was allotted in 2016.

By: Express News Service

The Delhi High Court on Monday directed the Centre to file a “better and comprehensive affidavit” to show that it will ensure adequate security to former Rajya Sabha MP Subramanian Swamy at his private residence in the national capital.

The Centre’s counsel informed a single-judge bench of Justice Yashwant Varma that the government had filed an affidavit of compliance stating that a “joint security review” had been conducted and that the “day he moves to his private residence the entire security set up will also be moved along with him”.

Senior advocate Jayant Mehta, appearing for the BJP leader, submitted that till date no steps had been taken despite the assurance given by the Centre on September 14.

Mehta said that “not one [piece of] infrastructure has been moved” to Swamy’s residence including “sentry gates”. He said that facilities for security personnel to take rest had to be there.

The central counsel submitted that if there was space at the private residence, infrastructure for the personnel would be created. “But if there is no space, what we do is we post six guards whom we keep rotating. To put this set-up in a colony may not be possible. Whatever his entitlement, he will get,” he said.

The counsel said that the Centre would put up tents for the guards at Swamy’s residence. The court asked when the government would do all of this and said that the movement of security set-up could not be simultaneous with Swamy’s move to the residence.

When the Centre’s counsel submitted that the guards would be rotated, the court asked him how the security personnel would rest, stand or sit. The counsel then said the government would submit the details in an affidavit.

Mehta submitted that despite repeated requests, the first time a visit was conducted at the residence was on October 27. “They got my application then they visited,” he said.

The court thereafter directed the Centre to file a better and comprehensive affidavit and listed the matter for hearing on November 3.

Swamy moved the court claiming that the central government had failed to ensure security arrangements at his private residence, after the court directed him on September 14 to vacate in six weeks the government accommodation, in the Lutyen’s Bungalow zone, that he was allotted in 2016